B.C.’s Grizzly Bear Trophy Hunt is Unbearable



The spring grizzly hunting season begins on April 1st, and in an article this week for the Georgia Straight, David Suzuki notes that disputes over hunting regulations shifts our attention away from the brutality of the grizzly bear trophy hunt—and its long-term ecological impact.

Even the economic case is shaky. Studies by the Centre for Responsible Travel and Raincoast Conservation conclude revenue from bear-viewing is far higher than revenue from grizzly hunting.

In the following excerpt, from Everything Under the Sun, David comments on the role grizzlies play in their ecosystem, the importance of bear watching as a source of income for First Nations communities, how bear watching brings in more income than bear hunting, and how this helps to form a sustainable basis for tourism in British Columbia.

B.C.’s Trophy Hunt Is Unbearable

Excerpted from Everything Under the Sun

For millennia, Aboriginal people have hunted wildlife for food, traditional purposes, and trade. But coastal First Nations in British Columbia argue that killing a threatened animal simply for the thrill of it is foreign to their culture. We call it sport, as if the animals had entered into a life and- death game. According to Haida leader Guujaaw, “It’s not right that anyone should make a sport of killing.”

I agree. Grizzlies are officially designated as a threatened species, and black bear subspecies on the B.C. coast are among the most diverse in North America, ranging from the spirit or kermode bear to the Haida black bear. Yet, the B.C. government has ignored pleas from First Nations and conservation groups and has continued to allow these majestic animals to be killed for sport, even in many parks and protected areas and in the Great Bear Rainforest. The results are devastating. As of 2009, in the thirty years that the government has kept records, close to eleven thousand grizzly bears have been killed in B.C., 88 per cent of them by sport hunters. Many are big-game hunters from the U.S. and Europe who pay thousands of dollars to kill a bear in B.C., since these marvellous bruins no longer exist in their own home countries.

First Nations have shared the land with bears for thousands of years. According to Guujaaw, “Bears are as much a part of the environment as we are.” Indeed, the bears that feed, breed, and roam among the archipelago of islands and lush mainland valleys of British Columbia play important roles in the ecosystems they inhabit. For example, bears, like other large predatory animals, help regulate prey populations such as deer and thereby prevent overgrazing in forests. Bears feeding on salmon in streams also distribute the nutrients from the fish carcasses across the forest floor. It is a direct transfer of nutrients from the ocean to the forest, and one of the reasons why coastal forests are so rich in biodiversity and why the trees grow to such monstrous sizes.

The ethical and scientific reasons to end the sport hunt are compelling, but so too are the economic arguments. This is particularly true for Aboriginal communities that see the non-consumptive use of bears, such as bear viewing, as potential sources of employment and income for their struggling communities. In 2003, a study by the Centre for Integral Economics showed that grizzly bear viewing brings in twice the income for coastal communities as the trophy hunt. One bear-watching operation in Knight Inlet grossed more than $3 million in direct revenue in 2007—more than all trophy-hunting revenue combined.

“Each bear killed is one less bear that tourists will pay top dollar to photograph,” said Dean Wyatt of the Commercial Bear Viewing Association. “Only a total ban on trophy hunting will ensure that bear populations can support the high-end viewing operations that add valuable income to coastal communities.”

Protecting opportunities for Aboriginal businesses to participate in the multi-million-dollar ecotourism industry in B.C. must be a priority for government. Art Sterritt, executive director of the Coastal First Nations Turning Point Initiative, argued that government must manage bears to promote sustainable tourism. “This is not a sustainable industry,” Sterritt has said of trophy hunting. “It is jeopardizing the sustainable industries we are trying to create.”

Killing bears for sport makes no sense scientifically, but it is also unethical and immoral to hunt these animals so that they become a head on a wall or a rug in front of a fireplace when tourists are willing to pay for the chance to photograph them alive and in the wild. Most British Columbians agree. A 2008 McAllister Opinion Research poll found that 79 per cent of B.C. residents believe that to kill a bear simply for the thrill of it is reprehensible and that the practice should end.

Today, the only place you’ll find a grizzly bear south of Wyoming is on California’s state flag. It would be more than a shame if all we had left to remember these magnificent animals in B.C. were a few films and First Nations carvings.


To learn more about the fragility of Grizzly Bear populations, click here.
For more information on the B.C. grizzly bear trophy hunt, click here.


The Plight of the Monarch Butterfly Migration

Why the great monarch butterfly migration is in danger of disappearing, population numbers are declining, and what we can do to help.

11 Inspiring David Suzuki Quotes

These inspiring David Suzuki quotes show that we have plenty to be optimistic about, from the miracle of life, beauty of nature, to what we have already done for a sustainable future.

Valuing Natural Resources: Gibsons Eco-Asset Strategy

Last summer, Gibsons, B.C., became the first municipality in North America to consider nature as an asset, and realize a huge idea central to David’s writings.


COMMENTS:

What do you think?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *